Criminals, Celebrities or Both? 

When one thinks of Woody Allen, some of the first words that come to mind would be screenwriter, director, actor, talented, and maybe even legend. He is an extremely well known man for many of his brilliant movies.

woodyallen woodyallen1

However, is this what he should be remembered for? For other individuals such as his ex-partner Mia Farrow, his son Ronan Farrow and adopted daughter Dylan Farrow words such as rapist, molester, and monster might come to mind when thinking of Woody Allen. Approximately 21 years ago, Woody Allen was accused of raping his adopted daughter, Dylan. At this time of the accusation Dylan was only 7 years old.


Although Dylan testifies then and till this day, that he did in fact touch her inappropriately, the evidence was not considered credible. Not credible? A 7 year old confessing to her adopted father touching her inappropriately is not credible? How can this be? Just because there was no anal or vaginal injury it is considered not-rape? In other words she is lying, right? At the young age of 7, Dylan was taught a lesson about the world. That lesson being that we live in a misogynistic world – a world in which is hostile to women. A world that constantly blames the victim, in most cases the female, instead of the perpetrator. Constantly, as a society we are making excuses to why one girl or woman got raped. She either drank too much, wore provocative clothing, had male friends she trusted, etc. Essentially, no matter what, she was asking for it by behaving a certain way. Always putting responsibility on the rape-victim and not the rapist.


However, it is not always a female victim and a male perpetrator, although that is the dominant form. The power inequality theory states, “power differences between men and women produce gender domination and subordination, leading to men’s sexual entitlement and rape” (Aulette and Wittner 2012: 273). The fact that there are people who commit rape is horrifying enough; but the fact that there are people who turn a blind eye or openly support these criminal acts is absolutely repulsing. During Woody Allen’s allegations many people, including females, stood by his side.

71st Annual Golden Globe Awards - Show

This reinforces the embedded idea that it is okay for males to get away with these acts. This demonstrates the obsession and importance we put on celebrities. We are willing to ignore these allegations against Woody Allen because of all the great movies he has created. In other words, the positive attributes of Woody Allen outweigh the negative. This did not only occur for Woody Allen, but many other famous celebrities. Michael Jackson also had allegations of child molestation; however, many people still praise him for his music. After these allegations, people continued to let there children hang out with Jackson at his own amusement park, potentially putting their children at risk.

Studio 54

Our society holds these celebrities to such high standards that they cannot do wrong, which may actually encourage them to commit deviant acts. When ‘googling’ Woody Allen many articles came up about his life, movies, and even about the allegations. Many of the discourse that covered the allegations, discredited Mia Farrow and framed Allen as innocent. This relates to Foucaults idea of biopower. Biopower describes the use of institutions and discourse to control the social body. These articles are all considered normalizing discourse – they reinforce the idea that it is okay, in this case for a male to take advantage of a female sexually. Especially if that male is famous.


However, not all discourse can be controlled and Ronan Farrow, Allen’s son is voicing his opinion.


Although Woody Allen denies molesting his adopted daughter Dylan, he does not deny his love for his step-daughter Soon-Yi Previn. Allen and Previn claim they did not start a romantic relationship till she was of consensual age of either 18 or 19.


Because they have been married now for 22 years does that mean that Previn could not have been a victim? Brownworth states, “Allen married their victims doesn’t make them any less victims” (Brownworth 2014). It absolutely still means she could be a victim. Many factors play into this situation. The obvious one is the age difference and the fact that Soon-Yi Previn looked at him as a father. Allen gave Previn the attention that she did not receive from her biological father. I believe this could put Previn at a vulnerability in which Allen took advantage of. Even though Previn was not a biological daughter, Allen was still considered her dad and he crossed boundaries. Although we cannot know the exact truth, Previn may have agreed to engage in intimacy in worries of loosing the most significant man in her life.


Besides the age, and gender, race also plays a factor. Allen is a White upper class male while Previn is an Asian female. This demonstrates another power inequality. Individuals within western culture may have dismissed this as rape because “Asian women are [also] stereotyped as sexually threatening dragon ladies, cunning femmes fatales who seduce white men, or geishas, who exist to please white men sexually and domestically” (Aulette and Wittner 2012: 111-112). In other words, Asian women are dehumanized and considered mere objects for sexual satisfaction.


Although Hollywood seems to believe that Allen’s and Previn’s relationship is okay, Ronon Farrow once again voices his opinion, highlighting the weirdness of the situation, while Mia Farrow encourages him!


Unfortunately, these celebrities have a major impact on a lot of individuals. People admire and look up to them and they are not always setting good examples. In order to limit or eliminate rape culture altogether, we need to put the focus on the perpetrator and not the victim. Less women are willing to come forward about rape because of the blame, guilt and shaming they receive. This is unacceptable! We need to change the discourse completely around in order to get any further! So next time you’re watching a Woody Allen movie or listening to Michael Jackson remember the victims!


Aulette R. Judy and Judith Wittner. 2012. Gender Worlds. 2nd ed. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Brownworth A. Victoria. 2014. “Op-ed: When Hollywood Excuses Famous Men Who Rape…” She Wired. Retrieved January 26, 2014 (

John Apple Jack – Sexually Progressive and Racially Ignorant 

John Apple Jack (2013) directed by Monkia Mitchell is a type of romantic comedy that features two gay men. Boy meets boy, boy forgets about boy, boy pines for boy. Fast forward ten years later when boy finally sees what’s been in front of him this entire time but now the other boy needs major convincing. This is the simple formula for the cliché romantic comedies; however, this time it involves a homosexual relationship. John (Chris McNally) is a wealthy, promiscuous, white man who runs his family restaurant. He has lived an extremely extravagant life with top of the line foods, drinks, cars, and men. However, after hearing of his sister’s engagement to his childhood crush, Jack (Kent S. Leung), John decides to confess to his family that he is attracted to men, although they were already aware. John hopes that Jack will see this confession as an act of commitment to him. His father shortly after hearing the news cuts John off from family money and leaves him with no place to stay.


Jack is a cook at John’s restaurant and is ready to create his own restaurant and family. Growing up he had always hoped that John would acknowledge him, fall in love and live happily ever after; however, after many years of being ignored, tension heated between the two. During one of their arguments, Jack throws an apple at John’s head to quiet him. Nevertheless, when John becomes homeless, it does not take him very long to find his way to Jack’s place. They spend the night together and realize that they are soul mates. This did not last very long, and Jack realized that John was not a 100 percent committed and he decided to marry his sister after all. John refused to let this happen and interrupted the wedding by throwing an apple at Jack’s head. Jack and John end up together and open their own restaurant entitled ‘John Apple Jack’.


For obvious reasons, the movie does an excellent job of portraying a relationship between two men. However, like most movies it also has its downfalls. When John admitted to being attracted to men, most of his family did not even flinch. It was a nonissue. As well, Jack’s mother considered it a nonissue and just wanted her son to be happy. Although this does happen for many people and is the hope for the future, it does not demonstrate the hardships that many gay men/women go through. Gay oppression still exists and John Apple Jack tends to ignore this.


The demonstration of Jack’s family was also extremely progressive. Many films produce the stereotypical Asian family by creating a patriarchal structure where the father makes all the decisions while the mother remains silent. There is typically a one-way communication where the adults speak to the children, and the children do not speak back. In addition, shame and guilt are used to control and train children. They emphasize loyalty and honour to the family and avoidance of shame and embarrassment to the family. The mothers typically use less nurturance and more verbal and physical punishment than White mothers who meet emotional needs of children. However, in John Apple Jack, this is not displayed. Jack does not have a father figure in his life because he was actually a product of in vitro (a progressive reproductive technology). The mother shows caring attributes throughout the entire movie and makes it known to her son that homosexuality is not shameful or embarrassing to her and should not be to him. It is actually John’s White mother who has an issue with his sexuality, but in the end accepts it.

Before John commits to Jack he has a variety of sexual encounters with other men. John hires a stereotypical Asian ESL boy toy. Although this role created many comical moments, it is offensive. This role is viewed as feminine, passive and submissive towards John (a White male). Therefore highlighting racial power dynamics. It mimics the colonized and colonizer relationship. Although Asian men are typically depicted as asexual within Western film, when they are viewed as sexual, they are “presented as wanting to be sexually subordinated and violated by a more dominant, stereotypical white male” (Kendall and Funk 2003: 106). As a result, gay Asian men are not seen as physically attractive but more appealing because of their submissiveness. In addition, Jack was also hired by John, which can be viewed as problematic.


In addition, cultural appropriation was a major theme within the film. John gives Jack the idea of Westernized Asian cuisine for his new restaurant. John is using traditional food of a marginalized culture (Asian) because it is viewed as profitable. This is harmful “because it is an extension of centuries of racism, genocide, and oppression” (Zinelibrary 2011: 5). It “treats all aspects of marginalized cultures (also known as targets of oppression) as free for the taking” (Zinelibrary 2011: 5). This is extremely problematic, and John Apple Jack reinforced this way of thinking.


John Apple Jack was an important movie in acknowledging different kinds of relationships such as between two gay men. However, it demonstrates the problematic factor that the LGBT community tends to ignore race.

Before going to the Reelout festival my understanding of queer films was very minimal. Throughout my four years at Queen’s University I have come to realize that the culture is extremely White, heterosexual, middle to upper class focused. The fact that these festivals still exist and they are not displayed in popular culture depicts homosexuality as different and the minority. It would be amazing to get to a point where these films are not viewed as progressive because it is about a gay relationship but viewed as standard, like heterosexual relationships.


Mitchell, Monika. (Director). (2013). John Apple Jack [Film].

Kendall, Christopher N. and Rus Ervin Funk. 2003. “Gay Male Pornography’s ‘Actors’: When ‘Fantasy’ Isn’t.” In Prostitution, Trafficking and Traumatic Stress. New York: The Haworth Maltreatment and Trauma Press.

“Cultural Appreciation or Cultural Appropriation.” 2011. Zinelibrary. Retrieved February 26, 2014 (



6 thoughts on “Eeyore

  1. I completely agree! I loved the fact that you addressed the response and social pressures most women receive when coming forward after being raped or sexually abused in any form. This is not something we tend to analyze however, I believe it strongly reflects the values of our society. Samantha Gailey who was raped at the age of merely thirteen years old by famous Roman Polanski spoke out in an interview with BBC in 2013 discussing the traumatic aftermath surrounding her rape. She stated “if I had to chose between reliving the rape and the grand-jury testimony, I would chose the rape.” In addition, when asked if Gailey were to have a thirteen year old daughter go through the same thing as she endured, she would question calling and reporting it to the police because “she wouldn’t want to make it worse than being raped” (BBC 2013). Our society is dismissing the seriousness of a crime such as rape to the point where we make rape victims themselves feel that reporting it will only make it worse. This mentality our society is teaching is disgusting and needs to be re-evaluated.

  2. I find it increasingly interesting that when the conversation of rape arises, the assumption made is that the victim is female. So many questions are asked such as, “Where was she? How serious was it? Was she drunk?” As you’ve stated, it is true that typically sexual violence is committed against women more than it is committed on men. Aulette and Wittner begin their chapter on sexual violence by outlining many cases of violence against Middle East women as well as outlining that women who are victims of sexual violence are usually harmed by people that they know (Aulette and Wittner 257). However, as the chapter goes on, it is also stated that men are victimized in public places more than women (Aulette and Wittner 267).

    Unforunately, rape survivors are often discouraged from reporting the crimes committed against them because of the reputation of being a ‘rape victim’ that follows, but good for Dylan for having the courage to publicly state her incidence. Rape culture is typically something that is nurtured. For example, boys and girls are exposed to the behaviours that society expects from each gender. Essentially, “the fear of crime and of public violence is gendered” (Aulette & Wittner 262).

    Aulette, Judy Root, and Judith Wittner. Gendered Worlds. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.

  3. Eeyore has the blues, before reading this article I did not fully understand the extent at which this terrible incident had gone. I knew Woody Allen was accused but never convicted and no conclusive evidence was found. It is hard to believe that a man with so much talent can have the audacity to attempt such a heinous act. The fact that he ended up marrying his stepdaughter should be proof enough that he molested the other daughter. This has proven to me that Woody Allen has no sense of morality, respect or regret. He has not put any effort into trying to mend what he has done wrong and those choices that he has made have completely shamed himself and ruined his family. They absolutely despise him and have no problem with publicising their opinions as the tweets by Ronan and Mia Farrow suggest. Good for them, that even though the industry is trying to sweep what atrocities have been committed under the rug, their opinions remain strong and that he should be exposed as the monster he truly is.

  4. This is a great blog post! I appreciate that you recognized that men can face sexual assault and rape too but it is definitely not as prevalent as with female victims. Marriage does not equal consent! Looking to arranged marriages in which wives feel pressured into sexual activity without consent is evidence enough. Kudos to Ronan for forgetting family pride and shame to speak out against Allen’s actions. His advocacy gives me hope that the stigma rape victims face will lessen and more women will feel safe to come forward with their stories and stop suffering in silence.

  5. I thought that your blog did an amazing job of analyzing the way race plays into this film. It was also important that you reminded us what we are typically exposed to (in terms of racial stereotypes in movies) so that the reader is able to contrast that with the context of this film. With regards to the response of parents, I do find that strange. Although I cannot speak on behalf of the LGBT community I don’t often hear stories of parents being fully accepting of their children’s homosexuality right away. It usually takes people time to become accepting, much like our society. The generation most of our parents belong to struggle more with accepting different sexual orientations, however I do believe (and hope) that when it is our generation’s turn to have children we are more easily accepting to it, as we are currently.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s